Skip to content
Taiwa no FumenPractical methods for shared thinking

English edition: the full translation has not yet received an independent line-by-line review. Check the linked sources and method-specific limits before use. Japanese PDFs and videos remain labelled.

Return to method results

Method guide · Arrange people and ideas

Affinity Diagramming (KJ Method)

Make sense of many observations without forcing outliers into a group.

People
3–8
Base procedure time
50 minutes
Recording
Shared record

Purpose: Organise and narrow ideas; Generate ideas.

English guide

Text acceptance is not approval of this rendered page, its media, or publication.

How this method works

A method for organising many opinions by similarity of meaning. Use it when many opinions or observations have accumulated but the issues remain unclear, or a list of words does not reveal the overall picture. Write one item per sticky note, bring notes with related meanings together, and give each group a short heading that expresses its content. Draw lines between groups to show closeness, opposition, or cause and effect. Keep minority views that do not fit any group rather than forcing them into one. The result is one diagram containing the original opinions, group headings, and relationship lines. Do not use it to choose among predefined options or for analysis that requires statistical representativeness.

Phase schedule

Minutes are cumulative from the start of the base plan, not a live timer. Read scaling for any additional time. Phase controls do not advance automatically.

  1. Write ideas0–10 minutes from the start (10 minutes)

    Action: Write. Participation: Individually.

    Individual record

  2. Bring related notes together10–25 minutes from the start (15 minutes)

    Action: Group. Participation: Everyone.

    Recording not separately specified for this phase

  3. Name each group25–35 minutes from the start (10 minutes)

    Action: Name. Participation: Everyone.

    Recording not separately specified for this phase

  4. Draw relationships35–50 minutes from the start (15 minutes)

    Action: Draw. Participation: Everyone.

    Shared record

Facilitation steps

  1. Agree on a question. In silence, each person writes one item per note for 10 minutes.
  2. Spread everyone’s notes on the table. Read them aloud and bring similar notes together.
  3. When a small group of 2–5 notes emerges, write a short heading expressing its essential meaning and place it above the group.
  4. Leave notes that do not belong to any group on their own; do not force them into one.
  5. Draw lines between groups to show closeness, opposition, and cause and effect.
  6. Look at the resulting arrangement. Invite each person to say briefly what has become visible.

If something changes

If

There are too many notes to group together.

Then

First divide them into two broad islands, then group notes within each island.

If

Group headings have become too abstract.

Then

First restate the meaning in everyday language: ‘What this is saying, in short, is …’, then write the heading.

Preparation

Materials

  • Sticky notes (20 per person, approximately 75 × 75 mm)
  • One thick pen per person, medium tip or wider
  • A large sheet of paper or a table, with at least an A1-sized work area

Room and setup

  • A large table or floor area that everyone can reach
  • If you mount the paper sheet on a wall, reserve one wall surface.

Adjust for people and time

Not recommended with fewer than 3 people: there is little comparison of perspectives and the result can lean toward one person’s classification. Up to 8 people, gather around one work area. Above 8 people, work separately in groups of 3–4, then bring only each group’s headings to a new work area and group those headings again.

Safety and non-applicable situations

Retain notes that do not fit a group. This arrangement is not evidence of statistical representativeness and is not a voting procedure.

Other methods to consider

Manuscript's recorded references

These translate the original manuscript's source and rights claims. They remain separate from any current-page notice below; they do not establish new verification.

  • Jiro Kawakita, Hassōhō (Chuko Shinsho)

    The Japanese source states: the method’s procedure is outside copyright protection; this description is original.

  • The Japanese source states that ‘KJ法’ is a registered trademark of Kawakita Research Institute Co., Ltd.; the name is used descriptively to explain the method.

    Trademark notice

Diagram, print, and video language

Original Japanese guide, diagram, and print view. Their labels and print text have not been translated; an English print edition is not provided here.

English video-library navigation. Original Japanese audio, subtitles and transcripts remain labelled Japanese resources. Their translations are separate later work. No remote player is embedded here.

The manual English phase controls are a navigation aid, not a live facilitation timer. Interactive diagram motion remains pending.

Editorial provenance

Japanese source status and logs are provenance only. They do not mean this English text or interface was field-tested. Historical fixed-text acceptance and hold records remain specific to their recorded versions; displaying them neither asserts current acceptance nor resolves source-specific restrictions.