Skip to content
Taiwa no FumenPractical methods for shared thinking

English edition: the full translation has not yet received an independent line-by-line review. Check the linked sources and method-specific limits before use. Japanese PDFs and videos remain labelled.

Return to method results

Method guide · Progress through phases

Mentorship

Begin a one-to-one learning relationship with an explicit purpose, boundaries, and a way to review it, separate from performance appraisal.

People
2–2
Base procedure time
60 minutes
Recording
Shared record

Purpose: Build working relationships; Explore through dialogue.

English guide

Text acceptance is not approval of this rendered page, its media, or publication.

How this method works

A method for a mentor and learner to begin designing a one-to-one learning relationship. Use it in organisations where people want someone to consult outside the hierarchy and separate from performance appraisal, but relationships fade after a few meetings because expectations and boundaries were never agreed. Ask about each other's background and motivation first, list possible purposes, then check boundaries and firm up an agreement, bringing mismatched implicit expectations into view early. The outputs are an agreement recording purpose and boundaries, a first learning step, and a way to reflect in future sessions. It is not suitable for a direct manager and report where the manager has appraisal authority, or where either person does not want to participate.

Phase schedule

Minutes are cumulative from the start of the base plan, not a live timer. Read scaling for any additional time. Phase controls do not advance automatically.

  1. Get to know each other0–15 minutes from the start (15 minutes)

    Action: Get to know. Participation: Pairs.

    Recording not separately specified for this phase

  2. List possible purposes15–25 minutes from the start (10 minutes)

    Action: List. Participation: Pairs.

    Individual record

  3. Check boundaries25–35 minutes from the start (10 minutes)

    Action: Check. Participation: Pairs.

    Shared record

  4. Firm up the agreement35–50 minutes from the start (15 minutes)

    Action: Firm up. Participation: Pairs.

    Shared record

  5. Arrange future sessions50–60 minutes from the start (10 minutes)

    Action: Arrange. Participation: Pairs.

    Shared record

Facilitation steps

  1. For 15 minutes, use the questions to ask each other about past experience and current interests.
  2. For 10 minutes, the two people list as many possibilities as they can for what to learn and which capabilities to develop.
  3. For 10 minutes, check together for topics that cannot be discussed and times when contact is not possible.
  4. For 15 minutes, choose one purpose from the possibilities and firm it up as an agreement together with the boundaries.
  5. For 10 minutes, arrange together how to reflect next time and how to keep records.

If something changes

If

Half the time for asking about backgrounds has passed and one person's speaking time is more than 3 times the other's.

Then

Together, switch for the remaining time to alternating brief answers, one question at a time.

If

After listing possible purposes, there is not a single overlap between the two people's suggestions.

Then

Explain one suggestion each to one another; the listener then chooses again from the possibilities that appealed to them.

If

When checking boundaries, only one person names topics that cannot be discussed.

Then

Also ask the other person whether they have constraints involving confidentiality or appraisal.

Preparation

Materials

  • Question cards about background and interests: 6 questions per pair, in card format
  • One A4 purpose-and-boundaries agreement sheet per pair
  • One reflection sheet with a learning-record field per person
  • One dark writing implement per person

Room and setup

  • One set of a table and chairs where the two people can talk face to face
  • At least 2 m between pairs, making neighbouring pairs difficult to overhear

Adjust for people and time

The number is always two people in one pair. Do not proceed with only one person while the other is absent, because that cannot constitute a relationship agreement. If 3 or more people want to do this, divide them into separate independent pairs and conduct this method once for each pair, separately.

Safety and non-applicable situations

Do not pair a direct manager with an employee they have authority to appraise, and do not proceed if either person is unwilling or absent. Check confidential topics and unavailable contact times explicitly.

Historical translation and source notes

These original notes are retained verbatim with their fixed source versions. This historical label does not resolve a source-specific concern or establish current acceptance.

  • Scaling requires independent pairs for 3 or more people but provides no allocation for an odd total. No trio, repeat participant, or rotation procedure has been added.

Manuscript's recorded references

These translate the original manuscript's source and rights claims. They remain separate from any current-page notice below; they do not establish new verification.

Current-page licence notice

A Taiwa no Fumen adaptation based on the Open Practice Library practice identified below. The manuscript's recorded references and the source page checked for this notice are shown separately.

Changes: explanations, timings, instructions, materials and branches were edited for this site. The English edition translates that Japanese manuscript; it is not a verbatim translation of the original practice.

The checked source footer names CC BY 4.0 but links to CC BY-SA 4.0. The official site source code contains the same mismatch. This has not been confirmed with the rights holders. This notice does not change the terms of the original material.

This site's contributions to the identified adaptation and English translation are shared under CC BY-SA 4.0. Credit the creators, identify the source and licence, indicate changes, and share adaptations under the same terms. This does not remove separate source terms or third-party rights.

This is not a blanket licence for the whole site, other original manuscripts, third-party photographs, logos, external templates or trademarks. The source's Except where noted qualification remains applicable.

Names are used descriptively to identify the source. No endorsement or approval by Open Practice Library or its contributors is implied.

See the linked legal code for its no-warranty and other provisions.

The additional contributor names are handles from the fixed official practice source. They are not inferred real names or a reconstruction of collapsed editor labels. The earlier attribution limits remain recorded.

Credits on the checked source page

  • Named contributors on the source page: John Tooth
  • Contributors listed in the official practice source (repository handles): @john-remoteaf

Source page checked on 2026-10-17: Mentorship.

Source lineage

    CC BY-SA 4.0 — this site's adaptation and translation contributions · Legal code · Official source policy

    This material-specific notice does not itself establish publication clearance. Preserved manuscript references above remain separate from the current page's credits and licence evidence.

    Diagram, print, and video language

    Original Japanese guide, diagram, and print view. Their labels and print text have not been translated; an English print edition is not provided here.

    English video-library navigation. Original Japanese audio, subtitles and transcripts remain labelled Japanese resources. Their translations are separate later work. No remote player is embedded here.

    The manual English phase controls are a navigation aid, not a live facilitation timer. Interactive diagram motion remains pending.

    Editorial provenance

    Japanese source status and logs are provenance only. They do not mean this English text or interface was field-tested. Historical fixed-text acceptance and hold records remain specific to their recorded versions; displaying them neither asserts current acceptance nor resolves source-specific restrictions.