Skip to content
Taiwa no FumenPractical methods for shared thinking

English edition: the full translation has not yet received an independent line-by-line review. Check the linked sources and method-specific limits before use. Japanese PDFs and videos remain labelled.

Return to session-plan results

Futures, risk and change

Monitor Risk Signals and Decision Deadlines

Combine early risk signs, evidence gaps and deferred decisions into one monitoring procedure.

People
3–20
Session time
165 minutes
Format
In person

English session plan

Original program status: draft. Source safety category: Medium; this is not a guarantee of safety.

Preparation: Standard preparation. Facilitation team: Four roles, including an experienced facilitator.

What this session can decide

Set monitoring items and decision deadlines. Specialist safety assessment, auditing and activation of crisis responses are carried out by the responsible authorities.

Outside its scope

  • Do not guarantee the absence of risk.
  • Do not use monitoring to shift responsibility onto others.
  • Do not leave serious incidents unattended until a meeting.

Primary caution: Do not guarantee the absence of risk.

Before starting

Question and scope
Combine early risk signs, evidence gaps and deferred decisions into one monitoring procedure. Before the session starts, state the subject and period to be covered in one sentence.
What is decided here
Set monitoring items and decision deadlines. Specialist safety assessment, auditing and activation of crisis responses are carried out by the responsible authorities.
Output recipient
At the end, the Recorder retains “Table of pending risk decisions”. Show decision-makers, deadlines, interim responses and conditions for resuming.
Participation and information boundaries
Explain that people may pass, rest or leave, and keep personal information, confidential information and judgements about attributes off the recording surface. Assign Participant support separately.
Operating team
Assign the Lead facilitator, Recorder, Timekeeper and Participant support before starting, and confirm who announces transitions and stops.
Next check
Decide the review date for “Table of pending risk decisions”, who may view it and who is responsible for the next decision.

Who takes responsibility

Lead facilitator

Keep “Monitor Risk Signals and Decision Deadlines” within its purpose and stated exclusions, and announce the start and end of each stage.

From before the start until the session ends.

Recorder

Record “Risk map of impact and ease of checking”, “Missing evidence, information sources and checking deadlines”, “Table of pending risk decisions” at each stage and hand the records to their recipients at the end.

From preparation of recording surfaces before the start through storage after the session.

Timekeeper

Notify the Lead facilitator 3 minutes before each stage ends and when switching to breaks or buffer time.

At the start of every stage and 3 minutes before its end.

Participant support

Receive requests to pass, rest, leave or check individually, and decide with the Lead facilitator whether resumption is possible.

From before the start until the session ends.

Session flow

Minutes are measured from the session start. Method time, transition time, breaks and buffer are shown separately; they are not additional overlapping activities.

  1. 0–63 minutes

    Place early warning signs on the map

    Method: Risk Radar · 0–60 minutes. Transition: 60–63 minutes (3 minutes).

    Identify signs that can be observed before an unwanted event and place them on a homemade Impact × Ease of checking adaptation sheet made for this programme. Distinguish it from the referenced method's Severity × Change diagram. Record rate of change, person responsible for checking, checking interval, and conditions for starting a response separately from the two axes. Pass unknown checking methods or values to the evidence-gap work as Unverified.

    Responsible: Lead facilitator; Recorder; Participant support

    Output: Risk map of impact and ease of checking

    Handoff: Retain placement by impact and ease of checking and rate of change in a separate field. Pass signs whose checking methods or supporting evidence are insufficient to the evidence-gap work.

    This stage may be shortened only in accordance with the stated conditions.

  2. 63–96 minutes

    Set out evidence gaps and checking methods

    Method: Evidence Gap Board · 63–93 minutes. Transition: 93–96 minutes (3 minutes).

    For each sign, distinguish evidence already available from evidence still missing. Record where to obtain it, how to check it, responsibility, deadline and what to do if it cannot be obtained.

    Responsible: Lead facilitator; Recorder; Participant support

    Output: Missing evidence, information sources and checking deadlines

    Handoff: Pass decisions needed by their deadlines to the stage that manages pending risk decisions.

    This stage is not marked as shortenable.

  3. 106–139 minutes

    Manage deferred decisions and their effects

    Method: Decision Debt Ledger · 106–136 minutes. Transition: 136–139 minutes (3 minutes).

    For each undecided matter, record the reason, decision-maker, deadline and effects of deferral. Also specify an immediate contact if serious signs appear before the deadline.

    Responsible: Lead facilitator; Recorder; Participant support

    Output: Table of pending risk decisions

    Handoff: Pass the risk map, missing evidence and table of pending risk decisions to the person responsible for risk.

    This stage is not marked as shortenable.

What is retained and who receives it

Risk map of impact and ease of checking

Owner: Recorder

Select signs to monitor as priorities by impact and ease of checking. Retain rate of change, person responsible for checking, checking interval, and conditions for starting a response in separate fields.

Missing evidence, information sources and checking deadlines

Owner: Recorder

Turn unknowns into research tasks rather than leaving them unattended.

Table of pending risk decisions

Owner: Recorder

Show decision-makers, deadlines, interim responses and conditions for resuming.

Materials and setup

Material names, quantities, groups and handling instructions retain the fixed draft's original helper-derived guidance. Where a format is marked “Source material specification”, the entire bound English source material entry takes precedence over the old helper-derived format guidance. This format-only correction does not resolve other instruction or safety concerns. English names are not substituted into a Japanese-keyed lookup.

Everyday tools

Marks distinguishing new, worsening and improving risks

Quantity: About 10 of each colour

Format: Three types of marks drawn with a black or blue pen. Pens of different colours may also be used if available.

Distinguish “New”, “Worsening” and “Improving” with shapes and words, for example ○, △ and □ respectively. There is no need to obtain three colours; include shapes or words even when using colour.

Dark writing tools

Quantity: 1 per person

Format: Dark broad-tip pens or whiteboard markers

Check that the ink flows and place the pens where participants can reach them. Avoid pale-coloured pens.

Judgement-item sticky notes

Quantity: 4 per person

Format: Sticky notes around 75 × 75 mm, or A4 copy paper cut into four pieces.

Do not buy specialised notes. Write “Judgement item” at the top of each paper slip. If participants write on them, use one item per slip and handwrite the necessary headings before the session starts.

Pens

Quantity: 1 per person

Format: Dark broad-tip pens or whiteboard markers

Check that the ink flows and place the pens where participants can reach them. Avoid pale-coloured pens.

Sticky notes for individual deferred decisions

Quantity: 4 per person

Format: Sticky notes around 75 × 75 mm, or A4 copy paper cut into four pieces.

Do not buy a special product; write One deferred decision at the top of paper pieces. If participants fill them in, use one item per card and handwrite needed headings before starting.

Sheets to prepare by hand

Programme-specific risk-placement and monitoring sheet: impact and ease of checking

Quantity: 1 surface

Format: Source material specification: One risk-positioning sheet, A2 or larger, with 2 axes: severity × change

Source-bound format display correction; the other fixed helper-derived guidance is unchanged.

Label this as a homemade adaptation sheet made for this programme, not as the same specification as the referenced method's Severity × Change diagram. Label the vertical axis Impact and the horizontal axis Ease of checking, with high and low at their ends. Treat ease of checking as access to checking methods or information. On the same surface, add separate fields for Sign, Rate of change, Person responsible for checking, Checking interval, and Conditions for starting a response. Do not substitute rate of change for the horizontal axis; mark unverified values as Unverified. Write headings in words rather than relying on colour alone.

Table for checking evidence gaps

Quantity: 1 sheet per group plus 1 for whole-group consolidation

Format: Source material specification: A3 evidence-gap boards: one per group and one for whole-group consolidation

Source-bound format display correction; the other fixed helper-derived guidance is unchanged.

For each claim to check, create fields headed “What is known”, “Missing evidence”, “Where to check” and “Deadline”.

Evidence-type cards

Quantity: 4 per group

Format: Sticky notes around 75 × 75 mm, or A4 copy paper cut into four pieces.

Do not buy specialised cards. Write “Evidence type” at the top of each paper slip. If participants write on them, use one item per slip and handwrite the necessary headings before the session starts.

Deferred-decision review table

Quantity: 1 sheet per group plus 1 for whole-group consolidation

Format: Source material specification: A3 ledger sheets (1 per group plus 1 for whole-group consolidation)

Source-bound format display correction; the other fixed helper-derived guidance is unchanged.

Divide the work surface into 7 fields: deferred decision, what is lost while it is held, information needed to resume, state allowing a resumption decision, future handling, information-gathering owner, and review date. Write headings in text rather than relying only on colour.

Deferred-decision review-date sticky notes

Quantity: 1 per held item

Format: Sticky notes around 75 × 75 mm, or A4 copy paper cut into four pieces.

Write Review date, Information to check by then, and Checking owner, and place it beside the relevant held item.

Information to gather before the session

Risk list currently in use

Quantity: 1 copy; 1 display surface visible to everyone

Format: Two A4 sheets placed side by side. Join them with masking tape if a larger surface is needed.

Before the session, obtain the risk list actually in use. Check that the risks, responsible people and checking dates are current, and do not substitute a blank sample. Display or project it so everyone can read it.

Setup for each method

Risk Radar

  1. One wall area or large table at least 150 cm wide, visible to everyone, for the positioning map

Evidence Gap Board

  1. One surface per group with existing evidence and missing evidence side by side, without a dividing line
  2. Space outside each group’s surface for items not needed this time, equal to 30% of that surface
  3. One wall surface for ordering gaps by the nearest decision deadline

Decision Debt Ledger

  1. A vertical surface at least 60 cm high per group, arranged with the oldest deferral at the top
  2. One tabletop surface per group divided into decide, wait, and withdraw areas
  3. One wall surface for rearranging items in order of the nearest review date

When to switch or stop

Fallbacks

There are more than 20 signs.

Limit the work to 10 signs with high impact for which an early response is possible.

Method guide: Risk Radar

Stop conditions

Serious signs involving life, safety or laws have already appeared.
Stop the meeting and switch to the formal emergency or reporting procedure.
A serious risk with no responsible person is deferred until the next meeting.
Escalate immediately to a higher-level responsible person and appoint an interim monitor.

Sources, rights and limits

This site has composed this programme’s purpose, method sequence, delivery instructions, roles, outputs and switching conditions. See each individual method page for that method’s sources and licences.

Original source records and their required notices are retained below. Their presence does not mean a new legal or cultural-safety clearance. Original citation titles are kept in their source language.

Sources and required notices for the 3 methods used

Risk Radar

  • Source: Dave Esra: Risk Radar | https://openpracticelibrary.com/practice/risk-radar-monitoring-and-controlling-risks/ | CC BY 4.0 adaptation; changes made
  • Source: CC BY 4.0 | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
  • Attribution: Dave Esra | Authors and contributors credited in the source material
  • Attribution: Taiwa no Fumen Editorial Team | Japanese adaptation and this site’s original illustrations
  • Changes and adaptation: Adapted with changes as Japanese facilitation scores
  • Cultural caution: open-method screening complete: Closed, ritual or sacred cultural practices are not used as sources; opting out, sensitive information and power differences are addressed in each method’s limits and branches.
  • Limits of this record: Individual contributors are credited. Text covered by CC BY 4.0 was adapted with changes into Japanese facilitation scores. Exception notices, the site logo and third-party embedded material were excluded.

Current-page credit and licence companion for this method

Evidence Gap Board

  • 対話の譜面編集部: 根拠の穴板 — Original description and diagrams
  • Source: Taiwa no Fumen Editorial Team: Evidence Gap Board | Original description and diagrams
  • Attribution: Taiwa no Fumen Editorial Team | This site’s text and illustrations
  • Cultural caution: open-method screening complete: Closed, ritual or sacred cultural practices are not used as sources; opting out, sensitive information and power differences are addressed in each method’s limits and branches.
  • Limits of this record: The editorial team independently created the text, procedures and diagrams. It claims no exclusive rights over general dialogue operations or ideas themselves.

Decision Debt Ledger

  • 対話の譜面編集部: 決定の負債台帳 — Original description and diagrams
  • Source: Taiwa no Fumen Editorial Team: Decision Debt Ledger | Original description and diagrams
  • Attribution: Taiwa no Fumen Editorial Team | This site’s text and illustrations
  • Cultural caution: open-method screening complete: Closed, ritual or sacred cultural practices are not used as sources; opting out, sensitive information and power differences are addressed in each method’s limits and branches.
  • Limits of this record: The editorial team independently created the text, procedures and diagrams. It claims no exclusive rights over general dialogue operations or ideas themselves.

Confirmed programme clarification

The user confirmed the current programme text and programme-specific material instructions. Original methods, quantities, timing and print diagrams are unchanged. Earlier fixed notes are retained below as historical notes; they are not removed or treated as independently resolved. User confirmation of programme wording is distinct from independent acceptance of its English translation, rendered screens, rights and release checks.

Historical fixed-draft notes

The original fixed draft notes are retained without deletion as historical records of those fixed source versions. Current material format corrections are separately identified above; these notes do not imply that other concerns have been resolved.

  • The fixed programme uses impact and ease of checking for the risk map, including catalog.practice.0, while preparedMaterials.1.item.instruction uses severity and change. Both axis pairs are translated as written; this unit does not reconcile them.

Japanese resources and historical source records

Original Japanese plan and its print view · Japanese operation pack or starter materials

An English print edition is not provided here. The linked plans, print views and operation materials are Japanese resources.

Historical recorded publication holds

The following original hold statements are retained verbatim with their fixed source versions. They are not a statement of current acceptance, nor does this historical label resolve a source-specific restriction.

  • English translation and rendered-page independent acceptance pending
  • Method dependency source/text SHA binding and current source-specific rights verification pending
  • Publication not cleared
Historical fixed-source and English-draft provenance

Japanese program SHA-256: f6a85f7fb0cee596d9684249b9c4250c7a9697d10ab1ced478d0fc67997e1f78

Fixed source context SHA-256: 2f7c4fc2ec9b1da8ec26667e1a3e6fbb97e9dca8440a1842ed1f7ce91ac06c47

English draft SHA-256: f3a2f2e2ab394152b88175657a589dfc8b138151b0cf7da1918295bab884d539

  • decision-debt-ledger: source c97cda4c55cf55e3187cfa2771d70efdea457cf1326a281f5facdcf786d228c2; English draft 92962f7142e1df99277d1768201e4b5182455697bca8b0a4068eb5eebc23184d
  • evidence-gap-board: source cbe2a27c52d07b23fd8ae8ddf3b3d92114d87e47517fe8e4ab42065d2d9d84c2; English draft 5a1833dab9ac30e20a7c777de6b1bab2b129d7eabe826a747703a4f451b15977
  • opl-risk-radar: source a68d28a7c3bf583367da3939a3c6fa242a17ca54505198dc71f5b8a5daa8a3e9; English draft 0de3ccc8a19d16b7a0d1aa13917070ce17b7b373af99cb5800bc7693a17d93d3

These hashes identify the checked inputs; they do not grant independent acceptance or publication clearance.